This is the fifth chapter of the Writing a JavaScript framework series. In this chapter, I am going to explain how to create a simple, yet powerful data binding library with the new ES6 Proxies.
The series is about an open-source client-side framework, called NX. During the series, I explain the main difficulties I had to overcome while writing the framework. If you are interested in NX please visit the home page.
The series includes the following chapters:
- Project structuring
- Execution timing
- Sandboxed code evaluation
- Data binding introduction
- Data Binding with ES6 Proxies (current chapter)
- Custom elements
- Client-side routing
Prerequisites
ES6 made JavaScript a lot more elegant, but the bulk of new features are just syntactic sugar. Proxies are one of the few non polyfillable additions. If you are not familiar with them, please take a quick look at the MDN Proxy docs before going on.
Having a basic knowledge of the ES6 Reflection API and Set, Map and WeakMap objects will also be helpful.
The nx-observe library
nx-observe is a data binding solution in under 140 lines of code. It exposes the observable(obj)
and observe(fn)
functions, which are used to create observable objects and observer functions. An observer function automatically executes when an observable property used by it changes. The example below demonstrates this.
// this is an observable object
const person = observable({name: 'John', age: 20})
function print () {
console.log(`${person.name}, ${person.age}`)
}
// this creates an observer function
// outputs 'John, 20' to the console
observe(print)
// outputs 'Dave, 20' to the console
setTimeout(() => person.name = 'Dave', 100)
// outputs 'Dave, 22' to the console
setTimeout(() => person.age = 22, 200)
The print
function passed to observe()
reruns every time person.name
or person.age
changes. print
is called an observer function.
If you are interested in a few more examples, please check the GitHub readme or the NX home page for a more lifelike scenario.
Implementing a simple observable
In this section, I am going to explain what happens under the hood of nx-observe. First, I will show you how changes to an observable’s properties are detected and paired with observers. Then I will explain a way to run the observer functions triggered by these changes.
Registering changes
Changes are registered by wrapping observable objects into ES6 Proxies. These proxies seamlessly intercept get and set operations with the help of the Reflection API.
The variables currentObserver
and queueObserver()
are used in the code below, but will only be explained in the next section. For now, it is enough to know that currentObserver
always points to the currently executing observer function, and queueObserver()
is a function that queues an observer to be executed soon.
/* maps observable properties to a Set of
observer functions, which use the property */
const observers = new WeakMap()
/* points to the currently running
observer function, can be undefined */
let currentObserver
/* transforms an object into an observable
by wrapping it into a proxy, it also adds a blank
Map for property-observer pairs to be saved later */
function observable (obj) {
observers.set(obj, new Map())
return new Proxy(obj, {get, set})
}
/* this trap intercepts get operations,
it does nothing if no observer is executing
at the moment */
function get (target, key, receiver) {
const result = Reflect.get(target, key, receiver)
if (currentObserver) {
registerObserver(target, key, currentObserver)
}
return result
}
/* if an observer function is running currently,
this function pairs the observer function
with the currently fetched observable property
and saves them into the observers Map */
function registerObserver (target, key, observer) {
let observersForKey = observers.get(target).get(key)
if (!observersForKey) {
observersForKey = new Set()
observers.get(target).set(key, observersForKey)
}
observersForKey.add(observer)
}
/* this trap intercepts set operations,
it queues every observer associated with the
currently set property to be executed later */
function set (target, key, value, receiver) {
const observersForKey = observers.get(target).get(key)
if (observersForKey) {
observersForKey.forEach(queueObserver)
}
return Reflect.set(target, key, value, receiver)
}
The get
trap does nothing if currentObserver
is not set. Otherwise, it pairs the fetched observable property and the currently running observer and saves them into the observers
WeakMap. Observers are saved into a Set
per observable property. This ensures that there are no duplicates.
The set
trap is retrieving all the observers paired with the modified observable property and queues them for later execution.
You can find a figure and a step-by-step description explaining the nx-observe example code below.
- The
person
observable object is created. currentObserver
is set toprint
.print
starts executing.person.name
is retrieved insideprint
.- The proxy
get
trap onperson
is invoked. - The observer Set belonging to the
(person, name)
pair is retrieved byobservers.get(person).get('name')
. currentObserver
(print) is added to the observer Set.- Step 4-7 are executed again with
person.age
. ${person.name}, ${person.age}
is printed to the console.print
finishes executing.currentObserver
is set to undefined.- Some other code starts running.
person.age
is set to a new value (22).- The proxy
set
trap onperson
is invoked. - The observer Set belonging to the
(person, age)
pair is retrieved byobservers.get(person).get('age')
. - Observers in the observer Set (including
print
) are queued for execution. print
executes again.
Running the observers
Queued observers run asynchronously in one batch, which results in superior performance. During registration, the observers are synchronously added to the queuedObservers
Set
. A Set
cannot contain duplicates, so enqueuing the same observer multiple times won’t result in multiple executions. If the Set
was empty before, a new task is scheduled to iterate and execute all the queued observers after some time.
/* contains the triggered observer functions,
which should run soon */
const queuedObservers = new Set()
/* points to the currently running observer,
it can be undefined */
let currentObserver
/* the exposed observe function */
function observe (fn) {
queueObserver(fn)
}
/* adds the observer to the queue and
ensures that the queue will be executed soon */
function queueObserver (observer) {
if (queuedObservers.size === 0) {
Promise.resolve().then(runObservers)
}
queuedObservers.add(observer)
}
/* runs the queued observers,
currentObserver is set to undefined in the end */
function runObservers () {
try {
queuedObservers.forEach(runObserver)
} finally {
currentObserver = undefined
queuedObservers.clear()
}
}
/* sets the global currentObserver to observer,
then executes it */
function runObserver (observer) {
currentObserver = observer
observer()
}
The code above ensures that whenever an observer is executing, the global currentObserver
variable points to it. Setting currentObserver
‘switches’ the get
traps on, to listen and pair currentObserver
with all the observable properties it uses while executing.
Building a dynamic observable tree
So far our model works nicely with single level data structures but requires us to wrap every new object-valued property in an observable by hand. For example, the code below would not work as expected.
const person = observable({data: {name: 'John'}})
function print () {
console.log(person.data.name)
}
// outputs 'John' to the console
observe(print)
// does nothing
setTimeout(() => person.data.name = 'Dave', 100)
In order to make this code work, we would have to replace observable({data: {name: 'John'}})
with observable({data: observable({name: 'John'})})
. Fortunately we can eliminate this inconvenience by modifying the get
trap a little bit.
function get (target, key, receiver) {
const result = Reflect.get(target, key, receiver)
if (currentObserver) {
registerObserver(target, key, currentObserver)
if (typeof result === 'object') {
const observableResult = observable(result)
Reflect.set(target, key, observableResult, receiver)
return observableResult
}
}
return result
}
The get
trap above wraps the returned value into an observable proxy before returning it – in case it is an object. This is perfect from a performance point of view too, since observables are only created when they are really needed by an observer.
Comparison with an ES5 technique
A very similar data binding technique can be implemented with ES5 property accessors (getter/setter) instead of ES6 Proxies. Many popular libraries use this technique, for example MobX and Vue. Using proxies over accessors has two main advantages and a major disadvantage.
Expando properties
Expando properties are dynamically added properties in JavaScript. The ES5 technique does not support expando properties since accessors have to be predefined per property to be able to intercept operations. This is a technical reason why central stores with a predefined set of keys are trending nowadays.
On the other hand, the Proxy technique does support expando properties, since proxies are defined per object and they intercept operations for every property of the object.
A typical example where expando properties are crucial is with using arrays. JavaScript arrays are pretty much useless without the ability to add or remove items from them. ES5 data binding techniques usually hack around this problem by providing custom or overwritten Array
methods.
Getters and setters
Libraries using the ES5 method provide ‘computed’ bound properties by some special syntax. These properties have their native equivalents, namely getters and setters. However the ES5 method uses getters/setters internally to set up the data binding logic, so it can not work with property accessors.
Proxies intercept every kind of property access and mutation, including getters and setters, so this does not pose a problem for the ES6 method.
The disadvantage
The big disadvantage of using Proxies is browser support. They are only supported in the most recent browsers and the best parts of the Proxy API are non polyfillable.
A few notes
The data binding method introduced here is a working one, but I made some simplifications to make it digestible. You can find a few notes below about the topics I left out because of this simplification.
Cleaning up
Memory leaks are nasty. The code introduced here avoids them in a sense, as it uses a WeakMap
to save the observers. This means that the observers associated with an observable are garbage collected together with the observable.
However, a possible use case could be a central, durable store with a frequently shifting DOM around it. In this case, DOM nodes should release all of their registered observers before they are garbage collected. This functionality is left out of the example, but you can check how the unobserve()
function is implemented in the nx-observe code.
Double wrapping with Proxies
Proxies are transparent, meaning there is no native way of determining if something is a Proxy or a plain object. Moreover, they can be nested infinitely, so without necessary precaution, we might end up wrapping an observable again and again.
There are many clever ways to make a Proxy distinguishable from normal objects, but I left it out of the example. One way would be to add a Proxy to a WeakSet
named proxies
and check for inclusion later. If you are interested in how nx-observe implements the isObservable()
method, please check the code.
Inheritance
nx-observe also works with prototypal inheritance. The example below demonstrates what does this mean exactly.
const parent = observable({greeting: 'Hello'})
const child = observable({subject: 'World!'})
Object.setPrototypeOf(child, parent)
function print () {
console.log(`${child.greeting} ${child.subject}`)
}
// outputs 'Hello World!' to the console
observe(print)
// outputs 'Hello There!' to the console
setTimeout(() => child.subject = 'There!')
// outputs 'Hey There!' to the console
setTimeout(() => parent.greeting = 'Hey', 100)
// outputs 'Look There!' to the console
setTimeout(() => child.greeting = 'Look', 200)
The get
operation is invoked for every member of the prototype chain until the property is found, so the observers are registered everywhere they could be needed.
There are some edge cases caused by the little-known fact that set
operations also walk the prototype chain (quite sneakily), but these won’t be covered here.
Internal properties
Proxies also intercept ‘internal property access’. Your code probably uses many internal properties that you usually don’t even think about. Some keys for such properties are the well-known Symbols for example. Properties like these are usually correctly intercepted by Proxies, but there are a few buggy cases.
Asynchronous nature
The observers could be run synchronously when the set
operation is intercepted. This would provide several advantages like less complexity, predictable timing and nicer stack traces, but it would also cause a big mess for certain scenarios.
Imagine pushing 1000 items to an observable array in a single loop. The array length would change a 1000 times and the observers associated with it would also execute a 1000 times in quick succession. This means running the exact same set of functions a 1000 times, which is rarely a useful thing.
Another problematic scenario would be two-way observations. The below code would start an infinite cycle if observers ran synchronously.
const observable1 = observable({prop: 'value1'})
const observable2 = observable({prop: 'value2'})
observe(() => observable1.prop = observable2.prop)
observe(() => observable2.prop = observable1.prop)
For these reasons nx-observe queues observers without duplicates and executes them in one batch as a microtask to avoid FOUC. If you are unfamiliar with the concept of a microtask, please check my previous article about timing in the browser.
Data binding with ES6 Proxies – the Conclusion
If you are interested in the NX framework, please visit the home page. Adventurous readers can find the NX source code in this Github repository and the nx-observe source code in this Github repository.
I hope you found this a good read, see you next time when weI’ll discuss custom HTML Elements!
If you have any thoughts on the topic, please share them in the comments.